Evaluation RuleDecision layer

Clonecode Rule: Adopt When Rebuild Volume Clears the Credit Math

Does our monthly site rebuild volume justify moving Clonecode from the free 2-page test to the $29 Pro tier, or should we stay on Starter at $9? Run the 2 free page downloads on a live client site first, then commit to Pro at $29 only once your monthly page captures exceed the 12 credits Starter gives you at $9.

By InnovaAI ResearchPublished

“Does our monthly site rebuild volume justify moving Clonecode from the free 2-page test to the $29 Pro tier, or should we stay on Starter at $9?”

Run the 2 free page downloads on a live client site first, then commit to Pro at $29 only once your monthly page captures exceed the 12 credits Starter gives you at $9.

Common Mistake

Agencies buy Pro at $29 on day one and then point Clonecode at client sites with logins, dashboards, or live search results, discover the capture is incomplete, and conclude the tool failed when the real error was choosing the wrong page type and overpaying for credits they had not yet proven they would use.

Why This Works

Clonecode's tiers are priced by credits, not seats: Starter at $9 carries 12 credits and Pro at $29 carries 40 at a lower price per page, so the tier decision is pure capture volume. The verdict places the break-even at agencies doing 5+ site rebuilds per month, where time saved extracting design tokens, fonts, and component structure outweighs the credit spend. Because each engagement burns credits tied to page count, the tool fits project add-on billing rather than recurring retainer revenue.

Apply When
  • •The agency completes 5 or more client site rebuilds or redesigns per month, the volume threshold where per-project credit cost is offset by design-spec extraction time saved
  • •Each engagement is a static or marketing site with no login-protected pages, since Clonecode cannot capture dynamic content like live feeds or search results
  • •Rebuild work is billed as a fixed-fee project add-on rather than recurring retainer, matching the credit-per-page model instead of seat-based pricing
  • •The delivery team already works inside Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, v0, Bolt, or ChatGPT and can consume the packaged prompts and tokens.json directly
  • •A single project consumes more than 3 pages, the point where Starter's 12 credits stop covering a month of work and Pro's 40 credits at $29 becomes the cheaper per-page rate