Operating ProcedureExecution layer

Pre-Launch Agent Failure Simulation (QA)

A sequence with 7 steps: Freeze the agent's scope boundary in writing before simulation begins.

By InnovaAI ResearchPublished

What are the steps?

sequence

Pre-Launch Agent Failure Simulation (QA)

  1. 01

    Freeze the agent's scope boundary in writing before simulation begins

    List every tool, API, and data store the agent may touch, and mark which ones carry client-facing or CRM write access. The n8n architecture guidance from September 2026 recommends classifying each workflow by autonomy level so human-review checkpoints land where liability is highest.

  2. 02

    Build a persona matrix that mirrors the client's real user base

    Cover at least the top five intents plus three adversarial personas: the impatient user who interrupts, the user who changes their mind mid-flow, and the user who supplies contradictory account details. Cekura's simulation approach runs thousands of these scenarios against voice and chat agents before go-live.

  3. 03

    Run the scenario suite and capture every trace, not just failures

    Passing runs establish the baseline that drift detection later compares against. Arize structures this as span, trace, and session-level evaluation so a single bad tool call can be isolated from a bad retrieval step.

  4. 04

    Score outputs against a written rubric with a calibrated judge

    Define pass criteria for accuracy, tone, refusal behavior, and task completion, then tune the judge against a sample of human-labeled runs. Hume AI's human feedback infrastructure exists precisely because automated judges drift from human judgment without periodic recalibration.

  5. 05

    Replay the ten worst failures and confirm each has a named owner

    Assign every failure to either a prompt fix, a retrieval fix, or a scope restriction, and record the decision in the client's delivery log. Agnost AI surfaces production failure patterns as actionable intents and can generate reviewed fixes, but a human still signs off.

  6. 06

    Set the go-live gate: no deployment until failure classes are closed or explicitly accepted

    Document accepted risks in the client-facing scope note, including the residual failure modes the client agreed to tolerate. This is the artifact that protects the retainer when an edge case surfaces in month two.

  7. 07

    Schedule the first post-launch trace review within seven days

    Simulation catches known failure modes; production surfaces the ones nobody imagined. A seven-day window is short enough to catch a bad launch before the client's own team notices.