Jylus
Jylus is a data and evidence layer for AI applications that compiles source-backed Context Packs from live records and historical data. It ingests events via HTTPS API or NATS JetStream, resolves current and historical state using as-of timestamps, detects contradictions, and attaches proof IDs to every retained fact before passing context to a model. Agencies use Jylus to reduce hallucination in AI agents, audit decision chains, and optimize token usage by filtering and deduplicating context. Queries support mixed structured, semantic, and relationship data types.
Jylus is a data and evidence layer for AI applications, priced at A$59/month on the Builder plan, integrating with NATS JetStream, Docker, OpenTelemetry, and GitHub. InnovaAI scores it 3.2/10 for agency adoption, best for AI Engineer, Project Manager, and Account Executive roles handling weekly client-facing work.
Agency Audit
Jylus compiles source-backed Context Packs from live data and historical records, attaching proof IDs to every fact before an AI model reasons over it. This is built for AI engineering teams and agencies building AI applications that need auditable evidence trails. Adoption pays off when your team builds AI agents or decision systems that must cite their sources, reduce hallucination through better-bounded context, or defend their outputs to clients or regulators.
3recommended
18/mo
$1,309/mo
Moderate
Illustrative scenario. Not a guarantee. Net capacity is the value of reclaimed time at $75/hr, less the lowest verified paid base plan (flat plan cost is shared). Hours saved come from the service estimate; implementation, taxes, and unprovided usage charges are excluded.
- AI Engineer handling AI agent context curation
- Project Manager handling historical state resolution
- Account Executive handling contradiction detection in live data
- Your agency does not build AI applications internally and only deploys off-the-shelf models or third-party AI tools for clients. Jylus is an engineering platform, not a client-facing product.
- Your data sources are static, well-structured, and rarely change. Jylus's value lies in handling real-time contradictions and historical state resolution.
- Your team lacks API integration experience or does not have an engineer who can wire HTTPS or NATS JetStream ingestion. Setup requires technical depth.
Internal Adoption Path
$41.30/mo
$41.30/mo flat plan
18 hr/mo
3 seats × 6 hr each
$1,350/mo
modeled at $75/hr labor rate
$1,309/mo
value − subscription cost
In this model, 3 seats reclaim 18 hours of team time each month. Valued at $75/hr that is $1,350/mo, and after the $41.30/mo subscription it leaves $1,309/mo of capacity for billable client work.
Illustrative scenario. Not a guarantee. Uses the lowest verified paid base plan. Implementation, taxes, and unprovided usage charges are excluded.
Platform Features
Core capabilities of Jylus
Source-backed Context Pack compilation
Jylus ingests raw records via HTTPS API or NATS JetStream, deduplicates facts, detects contradictions, and outputs a compact evidence pack with proof IDs attached. AI engineers use this to replace manual context curation and reduce hallucination risk.
As-of timestamp resolution
Resolves current and historical state by separating what happened from what was known at a given time. Project Managers and engineers building time-sensitive agents (e.g., compliance checks, audit trails) avoid stale-data bugs.
Contradiction detection and missing evidence reporting
Flags conflicting records and reports gaps in retrieved facts before the model sees them. Reduces downstream model errors and gives Account Executives concrete evidence to explain AI decisions to clients.
Proof ID attachment for auditability
Every retained fact carries a proof ID linking back to its source record. Founders and Operations teams use this to defend AI outputs in client reviews or regulatory audits without manual tracing.
Mixed query types (structured, semantic, relationship)
Supports SQL-like queries, semantic search, and graph traversal in a single call. Engineers building multi-modal agents reduce query complexity and latency.
Single-use trial without account creation
Test Jylus on your own data in an isolated tenant that auto-deletes after use. Lets your team evaluate fit before committing to a plan.
What Makes Jylus Different
Unique advantages vs similar tools in this niche
Proof-bound evidence with source IDs per fact
vs Vector search/RAG which lacks proof IDsEvery retained claim includes proof IDs, enabling auditability and traceability.
As-of state resolution and contradiction detection
vs Conventional RAG which retrieves similar content onlyJylus resolves current and historical state, detects contradictions, and reports missing evidence.
98.77% less model input vs full context
vs Sending full context to modelsCompiles compact Context Packs that reduce token usage while maintaining accuracy.
Value Equation
Outcome-likelihood-time-effort assessment for Jylus
Limited agency channel
Jylus scored below the agency-resellability threshold (agency_fit_score < 50). The Value Equation projects agency-side outcomes, which don't apply to tools without a clear resell pathway.
Contact JylusPricing
Jylus platform cost to your agency
Starts at A$59/mo (Builder), scales to A$2.0K/mo (Scale)
Builder
- 2,000 events/sec
- 5 GB searchable storage
- 14 days searchable history
- 8 concurrent queries
Startup
- 5,000 events/sec
- 10 GB searchable storage
- 30 days searchable history
- 16 concurrent queries
Scale
- 100,000 events/sec
- 250 GB searchable storage
- 365 days searchable history
- 256 concurrent queries
Enterprise
- Custom capacity and retention
- Architecture review
- Named support
- Contract-defined service terms
No verified white-label program for Jylus: client-facing delivery runs under the platform's native branding.
Prices as published by the vendor in AUD · your regional price may differ
Market Intelligence
Offer + scale economics for Jylus
Limited agency channel
Jylus scored below the agency-resellability threshold (agency_fit_score < 50). It's a useful tool but not designed for white-labeled or retainer-based reselling, so we don't publish productized offer economics for it.
Contact JylusInvestment Decision Framework
Strategic vetting analysis for Jylus
Situational Fit
Fit depends on your client mix
Buy If
4Your AI engineers spend 6+ hours per week manually curating and validating context for agent prompts because source data contains contradictions or stale records. Jylus detects conflicts and timestamps evidence automatically.
Your Project Managers or Account Executives field client questions about why an AI system made a specific decision and cannot point to the exact source record. Proof IDs let you trace every fact back to its origin.
Your team builds AI applications over live databases or APIs where data changes between requests, and you need to resolve what was true at a specific point in time. Jylus handles as-of timestamps natively.
Your Founder or Operations lead is concerned about token waste in LLM calls because context windows are bloated with irrelevant history. Jylus compacts evidence packs to reduce input tokens by filtering and deduplication.
Skip If
4Your AI workloads are simple retrieval or classification tasks that do not require auditable reasoning chains. Jylus overhead is not justified for low-complexity use cases.
Your agency does not build AI applications internally and only deploys off-the-shelf models or third-party AI tools for clients. Jylus is an engineering platform, not a client-facing product.
Your data sources are static, well-structured, and rarely change. Jylus's value lies in handling real-time contradictions and historical state resolution.
Your team lacks API integration experience or does not have an engineer who can wire HTTPS or NATS JetStream ingestion. Setup requires technical depth.
Bottom Line
Jylus compiles source-backed Context Packs from live data and historical records, attaching proof IDs to every fact before an AI model reasons over it. This is built for AI engineering teams and agencies building AI applications that need auditable evidence trails. Adoption pays off when your team builds AI agents or decision systems that must cite their sources, reduce hallucination through better-bounded context, or defend their outputs to clients or regulators.
Reality Check
Jylus requires your team to ingest data via API or NATS JetStream and restructure how you feed context to models. The learning curve is moderate for engineers but adds a new operational layer; ROI emerges only if your agency is actively building AI applications, not using off-the-shelf models.
High effort: requires technical configuration and team training
Academy for Jylus
Work through it in order: the course for this service first, then the modules behind it.
Course for this service
Jylus Agency Implementation, Reducing Hallucination and Auditing AI Agent Decisions
Learn how to architect AI agents with Jylus that compile source-backed Context Packs, resolve historical state with as-of timestamps, and detect contradictions before models respond. This course teaches agencies how to reduce hallucination risk, audit decision chains with proof IDs, and optimize token usage for retainer-based AI agent delivery.
Open the courseNo Academy modules are published for this service yet. Browse the full Academy
Why this category matters
The commercial case before the tooling.
Core concepts
The mental model you need to price and scope the work.
- Memory Portability PremiumConcept
Memory Portability Premium is the strategic value an agency captures when its agent memory layer exports cleanly, measured as the gap between what client context is worth inside a tool and what survives leaving it. Agencies accumulate client-specific architecture, brand rules, and debugging history across long-running retainers, and that accumulated context is the real deliverable asset. When the memory layer is a closed silo, switching tools means rebuilding months of context from scratch, so the premium collapses to zero and the vendor captures the rent. Knownbase stores decisions, debugging discoveries, and constraints as project notes retrievable across sessions and tools, which keeps the archive portable. Cogni runs retrieval through an entity graph with spreading activation and no LLM in the path, so connected facts stay model-agnostic. Bourdon federates one memory across Claude, Codex, Cursor, and Copilot, so a fact learned in one tool is recognized in the others. Before standardizing, test one export: pull a client's memory out and read it without the original tool.
- Recall Latency TaxConcept
Recall Latency Tax is the hidden cost of how long an agent takes to surface a fact it already learned. Every re-prompt, re-explanation, and context paste is a tax paid in senior hours, and it compounds across a retainer because the same client architecture gets re-taught every session. The framework separates two retrieval paths: recognition-first federation, where a fact learned by one agent is instantly available to others, versus search-based lookup, where the agent must be told what to look for. Bourdon's recognition-first design pushes recall latency toward zero across Claude, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, and Devin, while Knownbase organizes notes by project and tag so retrieval depends on correct querying. For an agency running five client accounts through three tools each, the difference shows up as fewer re-briefs per deliverable and more margin per retainer hour. Audit recall latency before you audit model quality.
- Context Compounding CurveConcept
Context Compounding Curve is the principle that an agency's agent stack gets cheaper per deliverable as shared memory accumulates, and more expensive per deliverable when each tool starts from zero. The first month of a retainer is the most expensive month: every agent re-learns the client's brand rules, stack constraints, and past decisions. By month six, a federated memory layer means a fact learned once (a rejected headline pattern, a CMS quirk, a compliance constraint) is recognized by every agent on the account. The curve bends only if memory is shared across tools rather than siloed per vendor. Bourdon's recognition-first federation and Vibsync's shared coding-agent memory both target that bend. The counterforce is model churn: Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, cutting per-task costs up to 30 percent, which resets the tool layer but not the memory layer. Agencies that keep memory portable capture the savings; agencies that don't re-pay the learning cost on every model swap.
Decision and risk
How to judge the fit, and the ways it goes wrong.
- When Agent Memory Spans Multiple Tools, Test Export Before You StandardizeEvaluation Rule
Before standardizing on any agent memory layer, export a full client knowledge set, re-import it into a second tool, and confirm the entity relationships survive the round trip.
- When Client Knowledge Lives in One Agent's Memory, Audit Portability Before Renewing the RetainerEvaluation Rule
Before you standardize a memory layer across client accounts, prove you can export the full entity graph, notes, and provenance in a readable format and reload it into a different tool.
- Agent Memory Decision: Federated Shared Memory vs Single-Vendor Project ArchiveDecision Framework
IF your agency runs three or more AI tools across concurrent client accounts and needs a fact learned in one session to surface in another without manual re-prompting, THEN standardize on a federated memory layer that multiple agents read and write. IF your work is concentrated in one coding tool, one delivery team, and a handful of long-lived projects, THEN a single structured project archive is cheaper and faster to operate.
- The Write-Only Memory Trap: Why Agent Memory Connectors Stall Agency DeliveryFailure Pattern
- The Single-Agent Memory Trap: Why Shared Knowledge Connectors Fail Across Agency Delivery TeamsFailure Pattern
Delivery system
Blueprints and procedures for running it as a service.
- Client Context Memory Layer Build (10-15 days)Implementation Blueprint
A delivery pattern that gives a client's AI agents persistent, queryable memory of brand rules, architecture decisions, and past work, so retainer teams stop re-prompting the same context every session. The agency ships a governed memory layer with export paths, not a single-vendor dependency.
- Memory Layer Portability Test (Handoff)Operating Procedure
- Agent Memory Write Gate (Delivery)Operating Procedure
- Client Context Ingestion Checklist (Onboarding)Operating Procedure
13 modules selected for Jylus
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers about pricing, setup, implementation
Jylus compiles source-backed Context Packs from changing records and real-time data, resolving current and historical state with as-of timestamps. It detects contradictions, reports missing evidence, and attaches proof IDs to every retained fact before a model reasons over it. Ingest via HTTPS API or NATS JetStream; query mixed structured, semantic, and relationship data.
Jylus offers 4 pricing tiers, starting at A$59/mo (Builder) up to A$1,999/mo (Scale).
AI engineers use Jylus to curate and validate context for agents, reducing hallucination and manual prompt engineering. Project Managers building AI applications over live data use as-of timestamps to avoid stale-record bugs. Account Executives cite proof IDs when defending AI decisions to clients. Founders and Operations leads use auditability to manage regulatory or compliance risk.
Conservative estimate is 4-8 hours per engineer per month on context curation and validation workflows, assuming your team builds 2+ AI agents or decision systems. Savings scale with data complexity (contradictions, historical corrections, multi-source ingestion). If your team does not build AI applications, hours saved is zero.
Jylus ingests data via HTTPS API or managed NATS JetStream and integrates with Docker, OpenTelemetry, GitHub, and Google. It does not directly connect to CRM, project management, or design tools; your engineering team must wire API calls to push data into Jylus.
Proof-of-concept (single agent or data source) typically takes 1-2 weeks for an experienced engineer. Full rollout across multiple agents or data pipelines takes 4-8 weeks depending on data schema complexity and API integration scope. The single-use trial lets you validate fit before committing engineering time.
Jylus does not use your data to train general-purpose AI models. On cancellation, your data is deleted according to the contract-defined retention policy (immediate for free tier, 30 days for paid plans unless otherwise specified).
Enterprise plans support contract-defined deployment options. Contact sales to discuss on-premise, VPC, or private-cloud hosting. Builder, Startup, and Scale plans run on Jylus-managed infrastructure in Sydney, Australia.