Tempo
Tempo is a Jira-embedded suite that unifies time tracking, capacity planning, cost monitoring, and portfolio reporting in a single workspace. Unlike standalone time-tracking tools that require data sync from Jira, Tempo operates natively within Jira projects, capturing billable hours, team capacity, and project budgets in real time and exporting to BigQuery, Tableau, and Power BI for advanced analytics. It serves professional services agencies, IT services firms, and software development shops that need to track project profitability, prevent resource overallocation, and align team capacity with strategic priorities without switching between tools. The suite includes AI-assisted time logging, mobile time tracking for iOS and Android, hierarchical portfolio visualization, and custom dashboard generation, making it a comprehensive alternative to pairing Jira with separate time-tracking and financial-management tools.
Tempo is a Jira-embedded suite, priced at $521 a seat a month on the Timesheets plan, integrating with Jira, BigQuery, Tableau and Power BI. InnovaAI rates it 5.9 of 10 for agency resale.
Agency Audit
Tempo is a Jira-native suite for time tracking, capacity planning, financial management, and portfolio reporting that helps agencies monitor project profitability and resource alignment in real time. It's built for professional services and software development agencies that already use Jira and need to track billable hours, prevent budget overruns, and visualize multi-project capacity constraints without leaving their project management workspace. Reselling Tempo works best for agencies serving enterprise clients or managing 5+ concurrent projects where time-tracking compliance and cost visibility drive retention, but the per-user pricing model means margins compress as client team sizes grow.
5.9/10
Depends on volume
1w about a week
- Your clients are already Jira users and need billable hours tracking with audit-ready records for compliance or client invoicing.
- You manage 5+ concurrent projects and want to bundle capacity planning and financial reporting into a single retainer without integrating separate tools.
- Your clients require real-time budget monitoring and project profitability dashboards to align resource allocation with strategic priorities.
- Your clients use project management tools other than Jira (Asana, Monday.com, Linear) as their primary system, since Tempo requires Jira as the core workspace.
- You need to white-label the entire interface for clients, as Tempo does not offer a verified white-label program and client-facing surfaces display the Tempo brand.
- Your client base consists of small teams under 5 people, where per-user pricing ($521/month for the first user, then $5.21/user for 11-100 users) makes the tool uneconomical relative to retainer revenue.
Profit Path
$521/mo
$3K–$8K/project
Monthly Recurring
Planning benchmark at United States price levels. Not a measured market survey.
Platform Features
Core capabilities of Tempo
AI-assisted time logging
Tempo suggests time entries based on Jira activity and calendar integrations, reducing manual data entry for distributed teams. Agencies can offer this to clients as a compliance and accuracy feature that cuts time-tracking overhead.
Billable hours tracking and reporting
Tracks which hours are billable versus internal, generates logged-time reports, and supports team-level approvals before invoicing. Critical for agencies that need to prove billable utilization to clients or justify project costs.
Real-time capacity and budget monitoring
Displays team capacity against project demand and monitors project costs and budgets in real time, preventing scope creep and resource overallocation. Agencies can use this to flag over-budget projects before they impact profitability.
Hierarchical portfolio visualization
Visualizes multiple projects and portfolios in hierarchical views, allowing agencies to see resource allocation across client accounts or service lines at a glance.
Custom dashboards and chart exports
Generates custom charts and dashboards for delivery and capacity reporting, with export to BigQuery, Tableau, and Power BI for advanced analytics. Agencies can embed these dashboards in client portals or executive reports.
Mobile time tracking
Tempo mobile app for iOS and Android allows field teams and remote workers to log time from anywhere, with offline support and calendar integration for context.
What Makes Tempo Different
Unique advantages vs similar tools in this niche
Native Jira integration for time tracking and portfolio management
vs Standalone tools like Harvest or Toggl that require separate data entryTempo operates directly within Jira, pulling issues and projects automatically, eliminating duplicate data entry.
AI suggestions for time logging
vs Manual time entry in tools like ClockifyAI gathers activity data from connected work systems to provide one-click time logging suggestions, reducing manual effort.
Comprehensive suite covering time, capacity, financials, and reporting
vs Point solutions that only handle one aspect like time tracking or capacity planningTempo unifies time, cost, capacity, and reporting in one Jira-native suite, ensuring all building blocks are in sync.
Latest Updates
Recent releases and improvements for Tempo
We're upgrading to Forge, here's what you need to know
ImprovementAtlassian is changing how Marketplace apps are built, and we're changing with it.
Introducing Public Shared Dashboards
NewShare live Jira dashboards with anyone, anywhere via Custom Charts for Jira.
Financial Manager is now available independent of Timesheets
NewYou can now use the worklog data your teams are already entering into Jira with Financial Manager, no extra configuration needed.
Additional scope options and project defaults in Financial Manager
ImprovementMore scope options and project defaults added to Financial Manager.
Easily roll out Tempo automation (Calendars & GitHub) across your organization to log time faster
NewOrg-level integrations with GitHub and Google and O365 Calendars now available in Timesheets.
Investment ROI Calculator
Value equation analysis for Tempo, based on the Hormozi framework
What is the Hormozi framework? A four-factor score: (what the service delivers × how reliably it delivers) divided by (how long it takes × how much effort it requires). A higher Value Multiplier means a better return on the time and money invested: faster, easier, and more proven results.
3.1× value multiple: invest $521/mo and agencies typically charge $3K–$8K/project for the work it powers.
Why This Succeeds
Higher is betterClient Results Potential
What your clients actually get
Meaningful improvements: delivers clear, demonstrable value to clients
Tempo is trusted by 30,000+ global companies
Reliability Score
How consistently this delivers results
Proven and reliable: consistent results across real implementations
Trusted by 1 in 3 of Fortune 500
Implementation Challenges
Lower is betterTime to First Revenue
How long until you can start earning
Longer ramp-up: cut to 1 day with Academy SOPs
Expect a few days from signup to first client delivery
Setup Effort
What it takes to get running
Near-turnkey: minimal setup before you can sell
High effort: requires technical configuration and team training
Strong ROI. Tempo at $521/mo supports market rates of $3K–$8K. Its 3.1× value-equation score weighs client outcome and likelihood against the time and effort to deliver, not cost.
Pricing
Tempo platform cost to your agency
Timesheets: $521/mo
Timesheets
- Calendar integrations
- AI suggestions
- Logged time report
- Team-level approvals
How usage-based pricing works
Tempo charges per consumption unit (per user (15001–20000)). Below are the component rates the vendor publishes. Each row is a separate charge: your total cost combines them based on your configuration and volume. Component rates range from $0.25 per user (15001–20000).
Final agency cost = (sum of selected component rates) × client usage volume. Confirm a usage estimate with each client before quoting.
Component Rates
Cost per unit: total depends on your configuration and volume
Add-ons
Optional extras priced on top of any main plan
No verified white-label program for Tempo: client-facing delivery runs under the platform's native branding.
Market Intelligence
How agencies monetize Tempo: real offer economics and market positioning
- Professional services agencies
- IT services firms
- Software development agencies
- Agencies not using Jira
- Small agencies needing standalone time tracking without Jira
Project-Based
ai-toolsAgency charges per-project fee for implementation. Ongoing optimization as optional retainer.
Offer Economics: What You Charge vs. What It Costs
Margin includes platform cost + agency labor at $75/hr. Per-seat platform scales with client count.
Growth-stage agencies or consultancies (20–80 staff) already on Jira needing structured time tracking and billable hours visibility for the first time
Mid-market professional services firms (50–200 staff) managing multiple concurrent projects who need resource forecasting and capacity visibility inside Jira
Mid-market to lower enterprise agencies or IT services firms (100–400 staff) needing project-level financial management, cost tracking, and budget governance within Jira
Enterprise organizations (500+ staff, multiple business units) requiring a full Tempo suite rollout covering time tracking, capacity planning, financial governance, and strategic portfolio reporting at scale
Scale Economics: Based on Starter Offer
Using Tempo Starter Time Tracking at $8K/client. Platform: $521/mo × 3 seat(s) per client. Labor: 8h/client × $75/hr.
Net = MRR - platform cost - labor (8h/client × $75/hr). Platform scales with seat count per client.
Investment Decision Framework
Strategic vetting analysis for Tempo
Consider
Favorable fit, worth a closer look
Buy If
4Your clients require real-time budget monitoring and project profitability dashboards to align resource allocation with strategic priorities.
You serve professional services or IT services firms where time tracking directly impacts project margins and client billing accuracy.
Your clients are already Jira users and need billable hours tracking with audit-ready records for compliance or client invoicing.
You manage 5+ concurrent projects and want to bundle capacity planning and financial reporting into a single retainer without integrating separate tools.
Skip If
4Your clients use project management tools other than Jira (Asana, Monday.com, Linear) as their primary system, since Tempo requires Jira as the core workspace.
You need to white-label the entire interface for clients, as Tempo does not offer a verified white-label program and client-facing surfaces display the Tempo brand.
Your client base consists of small teams under 5 people, where per-user pricing ($521/month for the first user, then $5.21/user for 11-100 users) makes the tool uneconomical relative to retainer revenue.
Your clients require HIPAA compliance or healthcare-specific data handling, as Tempo's compliance certifications are not documented in available materials.
Bottom Line
Tempo is a Jira-native suite for time tracking, capacity planning, financial management, and portfolio reporting that helps agencies monitor project profitability and resource alignment in real time. It's built for professional services and software development agencies that already use Jira and need to track billable hours, prevent budget overruns, and visualize multi-project capacity constraints without leaving their project management workspace. Reselling Tempo works best for agencies serving enterprise clients or managing 5+ concurrent projects where time-tracking compliance and cost visibility drive retention, but the per-user pricing model means margins compress as client team sizes grow.
Reality Check
Tempo's pricing scales with user count, making it expensive to resell to large client teams. The suite is tightly coupled to Jira, so agencies cannot offer it to clients using Monday.com, Asana, or other project tools as their primary system, even though Tempo integrates with monday.com for data export.
High effort: requires technical configuration and team training
Academy for Tempo
Work through it in order: the course for this service first, then the modules behind it.
Course for this service
Tempo Agency Implementation, Billable Delivery and Capacity Planning
Learn how to set up Tempo's native Jira integration to track billable hours, monitor project budgets in real time, and prevent resource overallocation across client engagements. This course teaches agencies how to configure AI-assisted time logging, establish team capacity baselines, and generate profitability reports that justify project costs to clients.
Open the courseNo Academy modules are published for this service yet. Browse the full Academy
Why this category matters
The commercial case before the tooling.
Core concepts
The mental model you need to price and scope the work.
- Utilization Ceiling TrapConcept
The Utilization Ceiling Trap is the point where an agency's billable utilization rate climbs so high that any new client request, sick day, or scope change triggers a cascade of missed deadlines. The framework holds that utilization above roughly 80% looks healthy on a dashboard but converts your delivery team into a single point of failure, because there is no slack to absorb variance. Agencies feel this as burnout, rushed work, and client churn that arrives months after the utilization number peaks. The practical move is to treat 15 to 20% of capacity as a deliberate buffer, not waste, and to track it as a named line item in resource planning. A concrete example: when Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10 per million input tokens with a 1M context window, agencies could route high-volume content processing through it and reclaim senior hours, but only if those hours were not already booked at 95% utilization. The buffer is what lets you redeploy capacity when a model or workflow shift makes it available.
- Capacity Truth LagConcept
Capacity Truth Lag is the gap between when a resource plan is set and when it reflects what is actually happening on client work. Agencies that schedule from stale data overbook senior specialists and underbook juniors, then discover the mismatch only when a retainer deliverable slips. The lag compounds: a two-week-old heatmap in Float or Resource Guru hides the fact that a designer has already been pulled onto an unplanned client request. Closing the lag means treating timesheet and booking data as a live input, not a monthly report. Toggl and Everhour feed actual hours back into the plan, while Runn and Tempo surface forecast-versus-actual variance before it becomes a margin problem. The framework matters because a plan that is 80% accurate today beats a perfect plan that is three weeks old.
- Billable Ratio DecayConcept
Billable Ratio Decay is the framework that separates two numbers agencies routinely conflate: utilization (hours booked against available hours) and billable ratio (hours actually invoiced against hours worked). A team can sit at 85% utilization while its billable ratio slides from 72% to 61%, because internal reviews, rework, and non-billable coordination absorb the difference. The decay is invisible on a capacity heatmap and shows up two months later as retainer margin compression. Tracking the gap between booked and invoiced hours per client gives agency operators an early warning that no scheduling view provides. The same discipline applies to AI-assisted delivery: Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5, priced at $0.10 per million input tokens with a 1M context window, makes automated document processing cheap enough that agencies must decide whether saved hours get rebilled or quietly absorbed into fixed-fee retainers. Tools such as Toggl, Everhour, and Hubstaff surface the invoiced side of the ratio; Float, Runn, and Resource Guru surface the booked side. Neither alone closes the loop.
Decision and risk
How to judge the fit, and the ways it goes wrong.
- Resource Planning Rule: Schedule Capacity, Not AspirationsEvaluation Rule
Book the work only against named people with verified open hours, and treat every unstaffed commitment as a delivery risk rather than a revenue win.
- Resource Planning Rule: Forecast Demand Before You Schedule SupplyEvaluation Rule
Build a defensible demand forecast from signed and probable work before buying scheduling software, because a capacity tool pointed at an unknown pipeline just renders the guesswork in a nicer interface.
- Resource Planning Decision: Live Capacity Ledger vs Quarterly Staffing PlanDecision Framework
IF client demand shifts inside a 30-day window more often than your staffing plan can absorb, THEN run a live capacity ledger where bookings, time entries, and utilization update weekly and drive assignment calls. IF your delivery mix is stable across two or more quarters and scope changes arrive with 30 days notice, THEN a quarterly staffing plan with monthly reconciliation is cheaper to operate and easier for account leads to defend.
- The Frozen Roster Trap: Why Resource Planning Stalls When Capacity Data Lags DemandFailure Pattern
- The Utilization Ceiling Trap: Why Resource Planning Fails When Billable Targets Outrun Skill SupplyFailure Pattern
Delivery system
Blueprints and procedures for running it as a service.
- Capacity-to-Billable Utilization Sprint (10-15 days)Implementation Blueprint
A fixed-scope engagement that maps an agency's real delivery capacity against booked and pipeline demand, then installs a scheduling cadence that lifts billable utilization without adding headcount. Built for shops running 8 to 60 delivery staff across retainer and project work.
- Capacity Baseline and Skill Map (Onboarding)Operating Procedure
- Bench Depth Review (Retention)Operating Procedure
- Rebalance Trigger Protocol (Delivery)Operating Procedure
13 modules selected for Tempo
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers about pricing, setup, implementation, and more
Tempo is a Jira-native suite that combines time tracking, capacity planning, financial management, and reporting. It logs time across Jira projects with AI-assisted suggestions, monitors team capacity against project demand, tracks project costs and budgets in real time, and exports data to BigQuery, Tableau, and Power BI for advanced analytics. Agencies use it to track billable hours, prevent budget overruns, and align resources with strategic priorities without leaving Jira.
Tempo lists 1 plan; the paid price is $521 a user a month (Timesheets).
No verified white-label program exists for Tempo. Client-facing surfaces display the Tempo brand, so you cannot present a fully branded portal or reports to end clients. This limits Tempo's appeal for agencies seeking to resell under their own brand.
Yes. Tempo is built natively within Jira and requires Jira as the core workspace. It also exports data to BigQuery, Tableau, Power BI, Confluence, ServiceNow, and monday.com, allowing agencies to pipe time and capacity data into existing analytics or reporting tools.
Setup time depends on Jira configuration complexity and the number of projects to onboard. Initial Jira integration is typically 15-30 minutes once the parent agency account is configured. Tempo does not publish a standard onboarding SLA, so confirm with their sales team for your specific client environment.
Tempo is built for professional services agencies, IT services firms, software development agencies, and enterprise project management offices. Any client that bills by the hour, tracks project profitability, or manages multiple concurrent projects with resource constraints is a strong fit.
Tempo's documentation does not explicitly describe multi-tenant client reporting or sub-account management. Confirm with Tempo sales whether you can create separate client workspaces within a single agency license and generate consolidated reporting across them.
Tempo stores time and capacity data within Jira, so historical records remain in Jira after cancellation. However, Tempo's reporting dashboards and portfolio views will no longer be available. Confirm data export options and retention policies with Tempo before signing clients into a retainer.